Skip to main contentSkip to search
Episciences
Open Access Journals
Sign in(new window)
Journal of Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization logo
Journal of Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization
Journal of Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization logo
Journal of Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization
Sign in(new window)
Articles & Issues
All articlesAll accepted articlesAll volumesLast volumeAuthors
About
The journalNewsStatistics
Boards
Publish
For authorsEthical charter
Submit
Journal of Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization logo
Contact
|
Credits
eISSN 2700-7448
|
RSS
|
Atom
Episciences
Documentation
|
Acknowledgements
|
Publishing policy
Accessibility: non-compliant
|
Legal mentions
|
Privacy statement
|
Terms of use
  1. Home > Articles & Issues >
  2. Articles >
  3. A penalty barrier fr ...
Article

A penalty barrier framework for nonconvex constrained optimization

Alberto De Marchi (1), Andreas Themelis (2)
(1) Universität der Bundeswehr München
(2) Kyushu University
Download article
Open on arXiv
Submitted on
October 17, 2024
Accepted on
August 14, 2025
Published on
August 19, 2025
Last modified on
August 19, 2025
Volume 5
Volume 5
Original research articles
DOI
10.46298/jnsao-2025-14585
License
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Indicators
488
Views
944
Downloads

A penalty barrier framework for nonconvex constrained optimization

Alberto De Marchi (1), Andreas Themelis (2)
(1) Universität der Bundeswehr München
(2) Kyushu University
Abstract
We consider minimization problems with structured objective function and smooth constraints, and present a flexible framework that combines the beneficial regularization effects of (exact) penalty and interior-point methods. In the fully nonconvex setting, a pure barrier approach requires careful steps when approaching the infeasible set, thus hindering convergence. We show how a tight integration with a penalty scheme mitigates this issue and enables the construction of subproblems whose domain is independent of the explicit constraints. This decoupling allows us to leverage efficient solvers designed for unconstrained or suitably structured optimization tasks. The key behind all this is a marginalization step: closely related to a conjugacy operation, this step effectively merges (exact) penalty and barrier into a smooth, full domain functional object. When the penalty exactness takes effect, the generated subproblems do not suffer the ill-conditioning typical of barrier methods, nor do they exhibit the nonsmoothness of exact penalty terms. We provide a theoretical characterization of the algorithm and its asymptotic properties, deriving convergence results for fully nonconvex problems. Stronger conclusions are available for the convex setting, where optimality can be guaranteed. Illustrative examples and numerical simulations demonstrate the wide range of problems our theory and algorithm are able to cover.
Keywords
  • Optimization and Control
  • 49J52, 49J53, 65K05, 90C06, 90C30
Mathematics Subject Classification 2020
  • 49J52 - Nonsmooth analysis
  • 65K05 - Numerical mathematical programming methods
  • 90C26 - Nonconvex programming, global optimization
  • 90C51 - Interior-point methods
Linked publications - datasets - software
  • Is supplemented by
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11098283
Preview
Loading PDF preview...